Criteria for Internal Assessment (Presentation)
·
Did
the presentation identify a relevant knowledge issue involved, implicit or
embedded in a real-life situation?
Achievement level |
Descriptor |
0 |
Level 1
was not achieved. |
1–2 |
The presentation
referred to a knowledge issue but it was irrelevant to the real-life
situation under consideration. |
3–4 |
The
presentation identified a knowledge issue that was in some ways relevant to
the real-life situation under consideration. |
5 |
The
presentation identified a knowledge issue that was clearly relevant to the
real-life situation under consideration. |
·
Did
the presentation show a good understanding of knowledge issues, in the context of
the real-life situation?
Achievement level |
Descriptor |
0 |
Level 1
was not achieved. |
1–2 |
The
presentation showed some understanding of knowledge issues. |
3–4 |
The
presentation showed an adequate understanding of knowledge issues. |
5 |
The
presentation showed a good understanding of knowledge issues. |
·
Did
the presentation, particularly in the use of arguments and examples, show an
individual approach and demonstrate the significance of the topic?
Achievement level |
Descriptor |
0 |
Level 1
was not achieved. |
1–2 |
The
presentation, in its use of arguments and examples or otherwise, showed
limited personal involvement and did not demonstrate the significance of the
topic. |
3–4 |
The presentation,
in its use of arguments and examples or otherwise, showed some personal
involvement and adequately demonstrated the significance of the topic. |
5 |
The
presentation, in its distinctively personal use of arguments and examples or otherwise,
showed clear personal involvement and fully demonstrated the significance of
the topic. |
·
Did
the presentation give a balanced account of how the topic could be approached
from different perspectives?
·
Did
the presentation show how the positions taken on the knowledge issues would
have implications in related areas?
·
In
awarding the higher achievement levels, the emphasis should be more on the
quality of the consideration of connections than on the quantity of connections
mentioned.
Achievement level |
Descriptor |
0 |
Level 1
was not achieved. |
1–2 |
The
presentation explored at least two different perspectives to some extent. |
3–4 |
The presentation
gave a satisfactory account of how the question could be approached from
different perspectives, and began to explore their similarities and
differences. |
5 |
The
presentation gave a clear account of how the question could be approached from
different perspectives and considered their implications in related areas. |