Japan in the 19th
century
Japan
began the 19th century as it had existed for centuries; A Tokugawa
Shogun ruled through a central bureaucracy tied by feudal alliances to local
daimyos and samurai. Taxes were based on agriculture and the samurai were sustained
by stipends paid to them by the shogunate.
Culturally, Japan
had two things going for it:
1. Neo-Confucianism grew among the elite (this fostered a
secularism which spared Japan
from the religious resistance to western based reform).
2. Japan
was also homogenous ethnically. There
would not be small pockets of ethnic groups pining for independence as in Russia
and the Ottoman Empire.
Japan’s
window to Europe continued to be the port city of Nagasaki
where Dutch Studies continued.
Otherwise, its isolation continued until mid century.
In 1853 American Matthew Perry threatened to bombard the
Japanese capital if they did not open up to American trade. Japan
opened itself to foreign influence and, as in China,
westerners residing in Japan
were not subject to Japanese laws.
There was a backlash against foreigners in the 1860s. The samurai, using surplus weapons from America’s
Civil War—which had just ended, defeated the shogun’s army. This delivered a
clear message about the supremacy of western military technology.
The Meiji seized control in 1871 and began a period of
reforms that would go much further than that of Russia. The so-called Meiji Restoration included the
following reforms:
1) feudalism
was abolished
2) political
power was centralized
3) the
samurai were sent abroad to learn about western science and tech
4) the
samurai were then abolished as a class
although
many samurai became more, some took their western learning and adopted modern
political and business practices. They
formed an important element of the new business class created by
industrialization. The most important example was Iwasaki Yataro
who founded the Mitsubishi company.
5) New
nobility
The government was also modernized into a centralized
imperial government with limited parliamentary rule.
1) constitution
created
2) New
Parliament, Diet, created based on German models (The Germans gave their leader
full military power and could name his ministers directly; this appealed to the
Japanese). The parliament could advise
government, but ultimate authority was given to the emperor. This combination gave great power to wealthy
businessmen who would influence Japanese industrialization accordingly.
3) Only
5% of Japanese men had the wealth requirement to vote
Thus Japan
borrowed from the West but retained aspects of its own identity. Compared to Russia,
Japan was
better off because they incorporated business leaders into its new government
structure whereas Russia
could not break the hold of the traditional aristocratic elite.
Industrial Revolution in Japan
1) armaments
updated (modern Navy created)
2) land
reform—peasants given ownership of land, Private Enterprise (Again,
compare with Russia
3) agricultural
taxes replaced by industrial taxes, revenues went up
4) Japan
borrowed from the West but maintained close supervision on the type of reforms
being admitted. They wanted to retain their own culture.
Major problem with Japan’s
industrialization: they had very limited natural resources and depended on
foreign coal and steel. This led them to
become the final great imperial nation of the 19th century. Japan
would practice imperialism in Asia to gain the resources
it did not have. Although it had a later
start to economic and industrial modernization, Japan
proved itself very quickly in two military conflicts:
1) Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895)
Japan
defeated China
in war for Korea
2) Russo-Japanese War (1904)
Japan
went to war with Russia
over Russian eastward encroachment in Asia, particularly
Manchuria and Korea.
The Russian navy traveled half way around the world only to
be completely crushed by the superior Japanese navy. This would, in part, lead to Revolution in
Russia in 1905.
Identity in Japan
What is Japan? It was no longer traditional, but neither was
it western. Japanese schools began to
advance the idea that filial loyalty to the emperor set them apart from other
nations. Thus allegiance to the emperor
became an intrinsic part of Japanese nationalism.
“As an antidote to social and cultural insecurity,
Japanese leaders urged national loyalty and devotion to the emperor. The values of obedience and harmony, which
the west lacked, would distinguish Japan
from the West. This sense of nationalism
would insulate Japan
from the revolutions that weakened Russia, and China
after 1900.” --Peter Stearns